Don’t Resent Grealish for Considering International Options

Jack Grealish (Ben Sutherland, Crystal Palace, London, UK; CC BY 2.0 via Wikimedia Commons).

Jack Grealish (Ben Sutherland, Crystal Palace, London, UK; CC BY 2.0 via Wikimedia Commons).

Jack Grealish has been playing for Ireland since the age of 14. Although he was born in Solihull, he qualifies to play in the green by virtue of three Ireland-born grandparents. Currently 19-years-old, he has, to date, represented Ireland from under-15 right through to under-21 level. As he has yet to represent Ireland in a competitive senior fixture, he remains entitled under FIFA’s eligibility regulations to switch national affiliation once to England, for whom he is also eligible through birth. Meanwhile, a senior competitive cap in the green jersey would cap-tie him to Ireland. Whilst the Irish senior manager, Martin O’Neill, has met with Grealish to gauge intent, the young Aston Villa player has made it clear that he does not wish to be considered for international selection – neither at under-age nor senior level – at the present moment in time in order to allow him to focus on his club career.

Whilst Grealish has stated his hope to return to the green jersey by September, his father-cum-spokesman, Kevin, has also spoken of his son as having a difficult international decision to make. Rightly or wrongly, it is widely and fearfully assumed in Ireland that the talented youngster is using the present time out to assess his chances of receiving a preferred senior England call-up before making what would be a career-changing decision by irreversibly committing to Ireland. This is in spite of Grealish not having stated any preference for England, however. Shay Given, with whom Grealish plays at Aston Villa, has spoken of his young team-mate’s present state of “confusion“; does Grealish remain with Ireland, for whom he has always played internationally and for whose senior squad he would almost certainly be selected in the now if he was willing, or, does he switch to England, where competition for senior places might be greater, but – let’s be realistic – where the chance of playing at World Cups and European Championships would be enhanced if he was to successfully implant himself in the team and where the potential commercial benefits would also be much more lucrative for him? Having been born in England and raised in a Birmingham household proud of its strong Irish heritage, he understandably shares national sentiment for both camps.

James McCarthy (Michael Kranewitter, Wikimedia Commons, CC-by-sa 3.0/at).

James McCarthy (Michael Kranewitter, Wikimedia Commons, CC-by-sa 3.0/at).

This would not be the first time that chattering Ireland supporters (and I am one myself) have exhibited a very contagious sense of collective insecurity when the commitment of a talented dual-eligible Irish player has found itself under the scrutiny of a speculative Irish media. Before Glasgow-born James McCarthy, qualifying for Ireland via the same rule Grealish does, made his senior competitive debut for Ireland against Macedonia in March of 2011 under Giovanni Trapattoni, there was widespread national (and irrational) fear amongst both casual and dedicated supporters that a player who had proudly played for Ireland since the age of 16 and who had already made his senior debut in a friendly against Brazil a year prior, but who was also yet to be cap-tied, was set to declare for Scotland, the country of his birth. The apprehension was on account of his withdrawal from a number of senior squad selections prior to and including for a Carling Nations Cup game against Wales. Even though McCarthy’s withdrawals were satisfactorily explained to all concerned as being fitness-related or a result of injury, it did not halt uninformed and paranoid imaginations from filling informational gaps with conjecture and presumptions that McCarthy’s attention was focused elsewhere.

Of course, tabloidesque elements in the media – habitually feasting upon smidgens of ambiguity – were more than delighted to exploit any lacking or incomplete information, including apparent disinformation, in the public domain and duly stoked their readers’ worries into a panic. Raising doubts over McCarthy’s commitment might well even have been a means to stir a sensational and unfair impression that there was some sort of falling out between Trapattoni and one of his players or that Trapattoni was somehow at fault for McCarthy’s inaccurately-alleged reservation on account of poor communication; tension, conflict, fear and frenzy are great sellers, after all. The discourteous media melodrama was in spite of McCarthy having resolutely stood by his 2007 decision to play for Ireland whilst enduring torrents of sectarian abuse from sections of Scottish crowds resentful of his “misplaced” allegiance during his time playing club football with Hamilton Academical. I wondered in 2011 why we Ireland supporters were so insecure so as to assume that a dual-eligible player, who had been faithfully turning up for us for years, lacked commitment or had been turning up through all that time whilst harbouring a secret and cynical desire to jump ship once push came to shove, irrespective of his numerous public and reassuring utterances on the matter. The question of why exactly such doubt and insecurity can so readily permeate the national psyche is indeed for another debate – perhaps it’s that infamous post-colonial inferiority complex – but the surest way to turn dual-eligible players off the idea of playing for Ireland must certainly be by perennially doubting their words and displays of loyalty.

Admittedly, the ambivalent Grealish has muddied the waters in a way that McCarthy never did, but perhaps we Irish observers are allowing the Anglocentric hype and expectation placed upon the young Aston Villa player of late to influence our thoughts and sense of balance to the point where we straightforwardly assume it must also be affecting Grealish. This would all be in spite of his father having informed us that “nothing has changed“, as far as his his September-return plans are concerned, since his son’s stand-out performance in Aston Villa’s 2-1 FA Cup semi-final win over Liverpool on the 19th of April caught the attention of the English media. Grealish has not exactly beckoned England just yet; in fact, he has rejected all their advances to date.

Since his outstanding performance during that game at Wembley, it would, of course, be grossly naïve to completely deny the possibility that having now caught the full attention of the English footballing community might be a game-changer for him. Nevertheless, the situation remains very much within Irish control. Ireland have been happy selecting Grealish over the years in full knowledge of his dual eligibility. There has been no obligation upon us to do so, nor is there an obligation upon us to continue entertaining him if we suspect his interests lie elsewhere.

I personally am not convinced he will make a change of association – it would be quite a U-turn if he did – nor will I resent him for making such a decision if he indeed does. Neither would I blame the FA for chasing an England-eligible player, nor Grealish for accepting what the FAI, too acting in self-interest, have been gladly offering him over the past half a decade. Some supporters and commentators are of the opinion that Grealish is presently stringing the FAI along and suspect he will inevitably disrespect us down the line by opting for the country of his birth if the opportunity presents itself. As stated, however, it is not as if the player-association relationship is a one-way altruistic one without mutual benefit for both parties and from which only Grealish is benefiting or stands to benefit. Let us not pretend that the FAI and Ireland do not stand to gain here too. The FAI, understandably, have been keen not to surrender the possibility of him ultimately committing to us.

Besides, Grealish has already returned something of tangible value to the association by turning up for Ireland to offer his services whenever called upon since aged 14 (his present unavailable status since last October notwithstanding), whilst the FAI are taking the approach that they hope will spawn a reward they feel will be worth all the stress and investment. It is a risk and they have been more than happy to have a gamble. If Ireland are happy simply to be an option instead of forcing the issue, whilst simultaneously persisting with his selection at under-21 level and without any assurance or declaration of long-term commitment, we cannot complain if he accepts such offerings and will ultimately have only ourselves to blame if he does eventually take advantage of the choices open to him and switches to England for senior football. We must accept the ultimate decision if it happens to go against us despite our investment. If he eventually “disrespects” Ireland, it will very much have been because we have put ourselves in a position where that is a distinct possibility. Of course, we Ireland fans should already be very well aware of the right Grealish enjoys under the eligibility regulations in light of ourselves having been in benefit of numerous players who have made the decision to change association from another to the FAI in the recent past.

I can see why the present uncertain state of affairs could be exasperating for some, but that is what placing a wager can entail and if we are indeed being “strung along”, it will be nobody’s fault but our own. Nobody has forced the FAI into this situation, nor are they being compelled to do anything against their will by Grealish. If we, collective Ireland, are being exploited, rather than it being a case of Grealish dictating the game, it is because we are voluntarily allowing ourselves to be. We are allowing the present situation to exist because we very much want to remain an option. It is important that we do not play the victim and shirk or deny responsibility for that over which we have control.

Rather than appeasing Grealish by giving him his time, O’Neill could, if he wanted to, issue the 19-year-old with an ultimatum tomorrow. It would remove the lingering option from the equation and we’d be done with the present state of uncertainty; we would either have a very talented and committed young player on our hands for whom we could make concrete future plans or we would be able to devote our attentions to something more worthwhile as Grealish goes his own way and devotes his own efforts solely to making it with England.

Just to clarify, however, I say all of the above simply to make a point. I am not jumping to any conclusions, nor am I assuming that we are actually being strung along by a cynical upstart; I am simply highlighting that we are more than happy to permit such a situation to be prolonged in hope and on account of our own selfish interests, so we should not pretend we are helpless or powerless to do anything. For what it is worth, I am not suggesting either that issuing Grealish an ultimatum would be the correct or most appropriate way to deal with the player; it would be a rather hard-line approach that could have the undesirable effect of alienating him. I happen to think that the respectful and agreeable manner in which O’Neill has already been dealing with the situation is spot on, for now, and if Grealish eventually decides to go elsewhere, so be it. I will wish him the best for the future.

On the other hand, if he is saying he wants to return to the green by September, I feel it would be reasonable to hold him to his word. He has already broken into the Aston Villa first-team squad as desired since agreeing a new contract and will be 20-years-old by then, having had a year away from international football to come to a decision. If he is not open to a senior Irish call-up come September, my patience may then wear thin if the FAI continue to entertain a player clearly not interested in committal, but I am prepared, out of good, honest faith in the integrity and clarity of the spoken word (rather than complete blind naïvety), to take Grealish at his word for now. I do not think I could defend pandering to a player after they have gone back on their word. I am, of course, well aware that there is a possibility of it happening, as there is with anything, but I would rather not be the one to engage in bad faith first by assuming him to be cynically deceiving us when we simply do not know what he is thinking deep down at the present juncture.

The above piece was also published on Backpage Football.

Post-script added on the 14th of May, 2015: Since writing the above piece, Jack Grealish was offered a place in the Ireland senior squad announced on Tuesday the 12th of May for the upcoming friendly game against England. He declined the invite, however, which has provoked criticism and anger from some Ireland supporters. I fail to understand though why the matter was raised publicly again on Tuesday. It should not be an issue at present and this attempted selection and decline does not really change anything substantively; Grealish remains on his self-imposed international break and had confirmed he hopes to be back in September. That agreement was being respected, or so I understood. If he goes back on his word in September, OK, make an issue of it then, but it should not be an issue right now. Now, he is being accused of “turning his back on Ireland“. Nonsense. He was placed in a situation that was not fully in line with what was agreed previously. If we were going to try and bring him in now and he had indeed responded positively at some point (be that last Monday night or whenever; further details on this below) before changing his mind, this should never have been made known to the media or public by FAI insiders (and certainly not before any official squad announcement was made with, worst of all, Grealish absent from the list). Now, we only look like we have been trying to pressure him, contrary to what was agreed, and he has unfortunately won enemies up and down the country for having done absolutely nothing wrong and simply having stuck to his original word. What were we expecting?

As alluded to above, there has been speculation in the media that Grealish had initially agreed to be in the squad on Monday night, before performing a U-turn after having had a discussion with his club manager, Tim Sherwood, on the Tuesday morning. If this is definitely true and, if true, whether Sherwood’s motive was simply to protect his player from an inevitable media frenzy at an important time for the club (Aston Villa still have to mathematically ensure their Premier League survival) or whether it was to urge his player to hold out for an England call-up instead, we do not yet know. It is entirely possible Sherwood’s motives were simply protective of a Grealish otherwise happy to accept the call-up, which, if that is the case, could mean the player will be more than happy to turn up again in future once his club manager no longer feels he requires protection. The alternative scenario – a much less desirable possibility – would have constituted a rather unprofessional interference by Sherwood and would have conflicted with his already-stated appreciation for what is purely Grealish’s personal choice and no-one else’s, so perhaps it is also the much less likely possibility. We shall see… I just hope the whole affair, along with the needless and completely unconstructive abuse thrown Grealish’s way over the past few days, will not have soured the young player’s fondness for Ireland!



  1. […] above piece was also in print here on Daniel’s […]


  2. Observer1 · · Reply

    Yes everything you say about Jack may or may not happen, I suppose we’ll all know better come September what his intentions are. But any Irish fan you would have to ask the question, when’s the last time any aspiring young Irish International turned down the chance to play for ‘their’ country? If he was only eligible for England and played for them from u16 to u21 do you honestly think he’d refuse the exact same Full International call up that he’s just received for Ireland? Yes the exact same ‘granny’ rule has benefited us and other National teams, but is farcical to think a player can basically take another young players place, that actually has ambitions / dreams of representing ‘their’ country. The IFA / FAI fallout is quite similar, except I think any Northern born Irish citizen should still have the choice to represent the ROI, but not if they decided to represent N.I at youth level. Basically if you don’t feel 100% Irish, British or English then why represent that association in the first place? Same principal will apply to Jack Grealish if he suddenly changes his mind. The problem lies with the rules, by 18 if you don’t know if you feel part of the Nation you’ve been representing there is something badly wrong.


    1. Thanks for your response.

      I appreciate it’s not ideal for us commitment-demanding fans, but the idea of young players taking breaks from international football is not unprecedented. Close to home, I know Ryan McLaughlin and Rory Donnelly (also dual-eligible players) declared themselves unavailable for selection by Northern Ireland for a temporary period of time before making themselves re-available. Northern Ireland fans naturally worried, but McLaughlin, in his case, emphasised that he was always committed and was genuinely just focusing on breaking through at Liverpool:

      I’m not necessarily saying the Grealish situation will conclude similarly; just pointing out that Grealish is not unique in wishing to focus on breaking through at his club, from where his livelihood ultimately stems.

      Of course, Darron Gibson went on a self-imposed exile for a spell after falling out with Trapattoni at Euro 2012 and Stephen Ireland retired early as he seemingly had little interest in international football, but I don’t feel those examples are truly relevant to this discussion.

      If the agreement was to leave Grealish be until September to let him decide, the offer from the FAI at the start of this week should either never have been made or it should never have been made public, considering the chance of a rejection was high, as such a rejection was always going to provoke a media storm.

      Grealish’s father also stated that Jack would have turned down an England call-up if the call had been from Hodgson rather than O’Neill, by the way:

      The reality is that Jack Grealish has sentiment for both the Irish and English national identities. It’s easy for us to talk and to expect him to do the same thing we think we would do if offered what he has been offered considering we identify solely as Irish. We feel one hundred per cent Irish, but how can anyone expect a dual national like Grealish to feel the same way? Identity is a complex matter.

      What you say is idealistic, which would be all well and good if we lived in an ideal world, but I don’t think it appreciates the practical reality. Think about Grealish as a 14-year-old being asked by the FAI if he’d be interested in going across to play for Ireland. (Or even, say, Shane Duffy being asked, as an Ireland-supporting youngster trying to further his footballing career, if he’d be interested in playing some international football by the IFA.) Of course a youngster without a fully-formed sense of self-identity will jump at the chance to get some formal or international recognition in their favoured sport. Who wouldn’t? Should it be held against him that he mightn’t have fully comprehended the concept of national identity at the time or that he failed to appreciate that his decision would present him with a rather difficult dilemma five years down the line? He wasn’t to know back then that England – with whom he also affiliates – were going to come in for him in the future, so why would he reject the opportunity to play for Ireland just because he might also have shared an affiliation with the English identity? That’s not to say that England have or would always have been his priority either, by the way. I think he’s genuinely split and it’s far too easy to cast judgment when looking at this from the outside and in hindsight.

      He has shown up since aged 14 when selected (excepting the present break). That’s something tangible he has returned. He didn’t have to bother. It is also important to acknowledge that it is the FAI who have been selecting Grealish over other eligible Irish players in the full knowledge of his dual status and in the hope that he will declare for us. There was never any obligation upon the FAI to select Grealish if his future commitment was ever a concern. (That’s not to doubt Grealish’s pride when he has represented us.) We have been more than aware of his options and have been trying to make him feel as comfortable as possible so as to enhance the likelihood of him eventually committing to us. If you find that problematic, your issue is with FAI policy.

      If another player you feel might be missing out is talented, he will be on the association’s radar. He’ll have had plenty of opportunities to catch a scout’s eye. If that player is missing out because there’s another player, such as Grealish, in the team occupying his preferred position, that’s a good incentive to try push on and improve. Players come and go all the time. Some things work out; others don’t. Players are like disposable commodities when it comes to their selection by associations. Should we be all that surprised when the same can apply in reverse? Players are free to retire or focus their attentions elsewhere if they wish. They don’t owe us supporters a career of service simply for having accepted a few call-ups in their youth. That’s life and we can move on and re-focus our energies on players who are interested and who are of immediate value then rather than harbouring resentment and a sense of victimhood.

      The rules can have their drawbacks and their benefits, but, in their defence, I think the overall benefit of ensuring that vulnerable dual national players are protected from being disposed of by associations and that multiple national identities are given effective recognition outweighs the negatives.


    2. Here’s an excellent piece well worth reading by a Birmingham-born Ireland fan:

      It offers some much-needed insight and perspective into Grealish’s dilemma.


  3. […] if the story does indeed transpire to be accurate, we Irish supporters should avoid getting too precious about the whole affair. There will inevitably be ire directed towards Grealish – there already has been on forums and […]


  4. […] be accurate, we Irish supporters should avoid getting too precious abo&#11…. There will inevitably be ire directed towards […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: